[OLDCATH-L] [old_catholic] Re: Remarks on Celibacy Requirement

[Sibyl Smirl]

Sam'l B wrote:
> On 02/12/2010 08:14 PM, Sibyl Smirl wrote:
>> Sam'l B wrote:
>>> 1) Paul is not Jesus
>> But Jesus Ordained married Peter (Cephas), and probably the others Paul
>> mentioned "other apostles, and [as] the brethren of the Lord" -- and if
>> he hadn't wanted them married, he'd have told them, and they'd have obeyed.
> 
> 	True, but irrelevant to the discussion of whether or not celibacy 
> invalidates Roman teaching -- which is the Jack Chick argument I am 
> deriding.

I didn't talk about the main argument: you asked for chapter and verse 
as to Jesus permitting the marriage of the Ordained, and I gave it to 
you, and one from Paul for good measure.



-- 


Sibyl Smirl
mailto:polycarpa3 at ckt.net

  Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are 
honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, 
whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if 
there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things. 
  Phl 4:8